This is more a rant than anything, and a bit removed from the dialogue of hiking, and hiking clothes for women. Yes I might love to start out a clothing firm of my very own which might also have it’s personal “social mission” so to speak. Clothing firms targets are getting cash by targeting ladies. In the method the majority of clothing companies make the world worse for women. It is as whether it is an agenda in opposition to women. Probably most women’s types are designed and conceptualized by men from the drawing board to the final sewing together of the apparel merchandise. The few ladies who are within the women’s clothing design industry apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a development toward higher clothes designs for women who want practicality, dignity and perform in their clothes. And that is where the dilemma comes in for loads of women who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Women who simply want purposeful, comfy clothes are really underrepresented . Sure, lots of people would say “Not so. Since loads of low-rise or skin-tight jeans, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-size shorts, and tastelessly-quick skirts are the kind of clothes that in all probability nearly all of ladies buy (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothing) , then it means those are the types that can proceed to be manufactured and furthermore these sorts of “feminine styles” will make their method into all varieties of women’s clothes, even the ones which are alleged to be for perform not fashion. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and so forth. It is not the only clothes firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates fashion into perform. It brings us again to where we began. As fairly a few girls who posted here on “Hiking Lady” have mentioned, they resort to men’s clothing for better match, higher consolation, higher freedom of movement and better durability. I would say that on the whole unisex sizing is the best option to go with some features that might help accommodate people who might have a bit more hip or stomach (both women and men). The vast majority of women’s “active wear” simply don’t have it. ’s clothes. Men’s sizes are bigger even when it comes to “small” sizes for males. I doubt that is not possible. In general, girls can fit into men’s clothes this manner. The scrubs had been supplied by the facility. I recently was working in a research facility and was required to wear scrubs. I informed her that in the case of scrubs, a measurement small pant does not fit me and it's strange as a result of most small-dimension men’s pants match me. The supply person stated she thought a size small would match me. The provision particular person said that it is because women have hips and males don’t. I informed her that it appears that evidently lots of small-sized men would find it exhausting to slot in most small-sized scrubs too. What lots of people seem to forget is that some males do have pretty-distinguished hips and the majority of men’s clothes are meant for males with completely straight hips. In truth when males get older, in their 40s they very often develop larger hips. Years in the past, I recall a radio industrial for a special type of Levis denims which were meant for older males and it was stated that the options had more room in the hip and thigh. But males have a greater deal in terms of clothes. Women’s clothing is always made to incorporate trend relatively than function. EMS and REI and Sierra Trading Post, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Guide, and varied different such stores, or on-line stores have some of the better varieties of clothing meant for hiking and different outside actions. Brands comparable to Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and varied others. These brands tend to have the very best materials, and the very best features. They have the most effective mix of fabrics in order to be lightweight as attainable for sizzling days and which may protect in cold days without a number of bulk. They are inclined to have SPF inbuilt to guard the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to make use of a big measurement to have room for my shoulders and arms but then the a part of the jacket that was under the waist bellowed out and simply was uncomfortable to wear and just had a very awkward look to it. Yet, I've seen such absurdly-reduce jackets for ladies by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to reinforce the female kind while being “useful” for outdoor activity, or that's what the designers had in thoughts and yet I should wonder what they have been considering by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and limiting after i moved. I don’t know the way it ever acquired manufactured and probably hundreds had been made and it appeared to be a waste of time and supplies and it seemed as if the “quality control people” missed some major design flaws. I want I wrote down the style number in order that perhaps I could find a link to it within the web and maybe you all can see for your self. There are different women’s energetic put on that will not be as excessive however which still have sufficient lack of operate so that most active ladies simply cannot use them. The Hole and Previous Navy aren't particularly for lively put on however they've small line of such clothing. I think that they're awful in material and design. The Hole, Old Navy, Modell’s, Goal, Ok-Mart and different such stores, essentially only have clothes product of cotton ( with a few exceptions). Modell’s is speculated to be a “sports store” however it carries exercise clothing for women which is made by Nike, Addidas (and so forth) and although these are properly-identified brand names, I discover that they actually put too much vogue into clothes on the expense of function. They went out of business years in the past however additionally they had clothing for girls that I discovered to be impractically designed. In New York Metropolis the place I stay there may be one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-nicely-identified store in decrease Manhattan which sells all sorts of outside/camping/hiking gear and clothes. There was once a retailer in NYC known as Herman’s and another referred to as Robbin’s. Far from it. I have seen women in these stores talking to gross sales associates and saying that they've seemed in every single place for more practical designs . There may be a company that loads of you most likely have heard of called “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s energetic put on. There are various Modell’s and one Sports activities Authority, and a few Old Navy’s and It would seem that there are numerous stores that may have something for every woman. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The majority of their kinds are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” whereas enjoying sports activities or engaging in rugged outside activities. Why do I always notice that the clothes that come the closest to being useful and rugged and practical are those which can be discontinued and replaced by those that aren’t? Their women’s bathing suits are actually useless. They're meant for girls who have good figures , even who're skilled fashions and the bathing suits are sexist in my opinion. They could proceed a sure model for several seasons or they could exchange the fashion and never revive it. Why ought to any bathing suit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the top be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain sorts of designs called “Grab and Go” that means that the clothes are so virtually designed which you can simply grab them, throw them on, and stroll out the door to train or do anything else. Are you going to go swimming or browsing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I want that it was as marketed to be. All through my life I've gone from retailer to retailer during certain times of the yr on the lookout for one of the best rugged and practical clothes for winter or summer. It's at all times hard to seek out something close to what I want. It often goes for footwear and slippers and different footwear too. I usually must take whatever comes closest and that's usually within the men’s section. There are designs which I'll go to my grave scratching my head over concerning why they were made the way in which they had been.. I as soon as discovered some snug slip-ons made by Teva. However the absurd factor was that the soles were designed with fairly-deep grooves that had been very closely spaced they usually were all over the only real . Simply why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They are the principle piece of clothing that can be touching the bottom and going by way of all kinds of disgusting stuff. I have had a fantasy of designing sneakers which are meant to be cleaned and are easy to clean. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To enable climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it doesn't work on any sort of foot wear like it works on a Jeep’s tires. I know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothing manufacturer noticed this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and so on) get stuck within the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the constant and intense rolling of the tires means that lots of the debris will probably be hurled off. No human can create that form of bodily force to repeatedly drive the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The way that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles arduous to clean. It signifies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots might be stuffed up with debris and wouldn't help much in serving to the wearer to effectively climb; that is that if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are actually meant to enable the wearer to climb. It seems to me that if the soles are manufactured from rubber there isn’t a necessity for such elaborately designed grooves that solely accumulate dirt. I'm wondering why there aren’t chemists and clothes technicians working on a better form of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips higher on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking sneakers are used, and it could make it unnecessary to make grooves on the soles of shoes. I have seen some unusual designs that do not contribute to function. It seems to me that grooves are simply put on the soles of sneakers for trend functions. This goes for sneakers too. A whole lot of sneakers which could be good in design in different ways, have very impractically designed soles. As far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and other such kinds of pants, there are those which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are those with drawstrings. In fact I'm not an skilled in making footwear or shoe-soles and i could possibly be flawed , however I am sufficient of an expert in carrying shoes meant for energetic lifestyles and I think that a lot of shoe manufacturers are specializing in the wrong thing. I'm wondering why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it unnecessary . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made in order that the drawstring is stitched into the again of the pants waist area. I hate something with a drawstring waist. I feel it makes the drawstring less effective and it defeats the aim of the drawstring. Underwear: I've been in stores comparable to Okay-Mart and Target where there are a large variety of women’s underwear. It is hard to seek out the type of briefs that almost all of our grandmothers used to wear, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my opinion. I prefer comfort, sturdiness and easy-care. All that does not communicate for me. Anything that gets stuck you-know-the place is unacceptable. I have been in the underwear part of shops and different shops (I must admit I never appeared in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t anticipate to seek out something sensible there), and I have seen older girls looking for one thing that's age-appropriate and dignified and , once more, practical. There's little apart from these hello-cuts. See one of the hyperlinks under for an article concerning the historical past of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” aren't modest sufficient. It seems it has all the time been about bodily limiting girls. That’s the best shorts bra way I take a look at it. Also one of many links below result in an article about how there will probably be a women’s like of clothing which shall be impressed by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It signifies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I've discovered to what I favor is a sure Jockey brand brief “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the higher kind of design to get. Elastic that is merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be less rugged and the stitching can come undone extra simply . I must order a dimension bigger than I usually would in order that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One main flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t perceive the real objective of “athletic bras” the way they're designed. I sure don’t care about “standing out.” ( I really don’t in any case, and i don’t care). Bras meant for active lifestyles should hold them in, nothing extra. I've heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I have seen some female runners who seem like prime heavy and nonetheless they are very quick however I wonder if they may develop again problems later in life. I know that I is probably not addressing the needs of women born with sure sizes, or who have particular wants akin to after surgery, but sport bras needs to be made to have sufficient snug tension to stop bouncing. There may be a need for bras that do what some jock straps are supposed to do. I wish to design shirts and vests with tension built into the fitting space that would make bras pointless. It can be fantastic for warmer weather and for simplicity, so that you don’t need to bother with attaching a bra and then a shirt. Just keep “them” from shifting. Simply slip into your shirt (and different clothes ) and you may exit to stroll , jog or whatever. Why isn’t there such a factor? I believe I discussed in certainly one of my previous posts that Coolibar had a fairly good pant for girls called Solar Pant. I am sure loads of ladies would need such sorts of clothing. I then put in an elastic band to provide extra tension because the waist band can be a bit too large in any other case, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to alter the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which concerned slicing into the again of the waistband space since the drawstring was sewn into that area. It is rather sensible for numerous activities. It's not so lengthy that the hem drags on the floor. It's not for very highly regarded weather however that can depend by yourself ability to tolerate scorching weather. It's of a material mix that isn't like cotton. All pants ought to have pockets, but sometimes the way in which the pockets are designed make them ineffective anyway. I discover it is a very individual factor. This is how most hiking pants needs to be designed. It is a teensy bit too dense for very popular weather very very similar to the unique Coolibar Solar Pant. It is meant for use with a belt however I discover that I don’t want one to wear this pant. I found a pant on Cabela’s that's for males, however which matches nicely and it's named “The utility Pant” (see one of the last two hyperlinks beneath). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight when you bend or move. In fact not everybody has the identical figure as I achieve this others might have a different opinion. But normally this is a good kind of pant . When you do like it you need to write to the company and inform them to hang on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the entrance pockets are designed so as the openings are slits almost completely parallel with the waist. I think they're going to discontinue it so that you may want to offer it a attempt. The fabric stretches so it's not as dangerous as if it have been with jeans with these sorts of pockets. It is an impractical design and that i don’t know why clothing designers make pant pockets like this. With these kinds of pockets it's important to maneuver your palms in a more unnatural way and even elevate the hem of your shirt to put your palms in your front pants pockets. It must be for fashion, nothing else. Pockets needs to be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is sweet too. It's a good suggestion to have zippered pockets. Anyone who has ever gotten his/her open pocket stuck on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too close will know what I imply. However typically zippers could cause scrapes to the back of the hand when you place your arms in. There's a must design zippers of non-scraping material for this purpose. There is also one other men’s pant from Columbia. I think I discussed them before (see considered one of the two hyperlinks below). Why aren’t any clothes designers working on this? They are of a very good materials for hot days, however for me, I discovered myself eradicating the belt and sewing an elastic band within the back of the waistband area in order to make the belt unnecessary. I ride a bike. I hardly ever use shorts even after i jog. But again, I should settle for no matter comes close to what I need. I came throughout a running brief known as Brooks Sherpa IV. I have a tendency to only go to clothing stores to have a look at designs and supplies . What I did like about it was the lightweight material. I just questioned why regular lengthy pants are usually not product of such a cloth. It could be excellent for a hiking pant meant for very popular weather. The material was very very like a really very lightweight softshell. There's one from the North Face called The Prolix jacket. I really like softshell clothing. It is rather lightweight, not superb for chilly weather by itself but you'll be able to put layering beneath it. It is flexible and fits excellently and permits freedom of movement. But softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer. Also , why aren’t there any really really virtually-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make an important summertime softshell. There must be a vest for touring. I find myself wishing for such a thing. It does not exist. Why not make one in every of lightweight and stretchy materials? I know that I have mentioned to a lot on this put up. I'll cease for now. I hope I didn't bore anyone. I have plenty of concepts for the better design of clothes and I'll probably publish once more with my concepts except I am instructed to not. I might have been a bit political too.
