This is more a rant than anything, and a bit removed from the dialogue of hiking, and hiking clothes for women. Yes I might love to start a clothing company of my own which might even have it’s own “social mission” so to talk. Clothes corporations aims are creating wealth by focusing on ladies. In the method the majority of clothes corporations make the world worse for girls. It's as whether it is an agenda in opposition to ladies. Most likely most women’s types are designed and conceptualized by men from the drawing board to the ultimate sewing collectively of the apparel item. The few ladies who are within the women’s clothing design business apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a trend toward higher clothes designs for ladies who want practicality, dignity and perform of their clothes. And that is the place the dilemma is available in for lots of ladies who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Women who just want purposeful, comfy clothes are actually underrepresented . Certain, a lot of people would say “Not so. Since a whole lot of low-rise or skin-tight jeans, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-size shorts, and tastelessly-brief skirts are the sort of clothes that in all probability the majority of ladies buy (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothes) , then it means those are the styles that may continue to be manufactured and furthermore these kinds of “feminine styles” will make their manner into all forms of women’s clothes, even those that are alleged to be for function not vogue. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches etc. It isn't the one clothing company that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates fashion into perform. It brings us again to the place we began. As fairly a few girls who posted here on “Hiking Lady” have mentioned, they resort to men’s clothing for better match, higher consolation, better freedom of movement and better durability. I would say that generally unisex sizing is the most effective technique to go along with some options that may help accommodate people who may need a bit more hip or stomach (both men and women). The majority of women’s “active wear” simply don’t have it. ’s clothing. Men’s sizes are bigger even relating to “small” sizes for men. I doubt this is impossible. On the whole, women can fit into men’s clothes this fashion. The scrubs had been supplied by the facility. I not too long ago was working in a analysis facility and was required to wear scrubs. I advised her that when it comes to scrubs, a measurement small pant doesn't match me and it's unusual as a result of most small-dimension men’s pants fit me. The provision particular person mentioned she thought a dimension small would match me. The availability particular person stated that it is as a result of women have hips and men don’t. I told her that it appears that evidently a whole lot of small-sized males would discover it hard to slot in most small-sized scrubs too. What a lot of people appear to overlook is that some men do have pretty-outstanding hips and the majority of men’s clothes are meant for men with completely straight hips. Actually when men get older, of their 40s they fairly often develop bigger hips. Years in the past, I recall a radio industrial for a special form of Levis jeans which have been meant for older males and it was stated that the options had extra room in the hip and thigh. But men have a greater deal when it comes to clothes. Women’s clothing is always made to include vogue slightly than function. EMS and REI and Sierra Trading Post, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Guide, and varied different such stores, or online stores have a few of the higher sorts of clothes meant for hiking and other outdoor actions. Brands equivalent to Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and various others. These brands are likely to have the absolute best materials, and one of the best features. They've the perfect mix of fabrics so as to be lightweight as attainable for hot days and which can protect in cold days with out numerous bulk. They are inclined to have SPF inbuilt to protect the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to make use of a big size to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the a part of the jacket that was below the waist bellowed out and simply was uncomfortable to put on and just had a really awkward look to it. But, I have seen such absurdly-lower jackets for girls by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to reinforce the feminine type while being “useful” for outdoor exercise, or that is what the designers had in thoughts and but I have to surprise what they had been considering by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and proscribing after i moved. I don’t know the way it ever bought manufactured and possibly hundreds have been made and it gave the impression to be a waste of time and materials and it appeared as if the “quality control people” missed some main design flaws. I wish I wrote down the model number so that maybe I might find a link to it within the web and perhaps you all can see for yourself. There are other women’s energetic wear that may not be as excessive however which still have enough lack of function so that almost all lively women simply can not use them. The Hole and Outdated Navy should not notably for active put on however they've small line of such clothes. I think that they're terrible in material and design. The Gap, Previous Navy, Modell’s, Goal, Okay-Mart and other such stores, primarily only have clothes fabricated from cotton ( with just a few exceptions). Modell’s is purported to be a “sports store” but it surely carries train clothes for women which is made by Nike, Addidas (and so on) and although these are properly-known model names, I find that they really put an excessive amount of style into clothes at the expense of operate. They went out of business years in the past however in addition they had clothing for ladies that I discovered to be impractically designed. In New York City where I reside there's one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-properly-recognized retailer in lower Manhattan which sells all sorts of out of doors/camping/hiking tools and clothing. There was a store in NYC known as Herman’s and one other called Robbin’s. Far from it. I have seen ladies in these stores talking to gross sales associates and saying that they have seemed in all places for extra practical designs . There is an organization that a lot of you in all probability have heard of known as “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s active put on. There are numerous Modell’s and one Sports Authority, and some Previous Navy’s and It would seem that there are a lot of shops that would have something for each leggings and bra set lady. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The vast majority of their kinds are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” whereas playing sports or partaking in rugged outside activities. Why do I always discover that the clothes that come the closest to being practical and rugged and practical are those that are discontinued and replaced by people who aren’t? Their women’s bathing suits are really useless. They are meant for girls who've excellent figures , even who're professional models and the bathing suits are sexist in my opinion. They could continue a certain model for several seasons or they may substitute the style and never revive it. Why should any bathing suit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the top be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had sure kinds of designs referred to as “Grab and Go” which means that the clothes are so practically designed you can just seize them, throw them on, and stroll out the door to train or do the rest. Are you going to go swimming or surfing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I want that it was as advertised to be. Throughout my life I have gone from retailer to store throughout sure times of the 12 months on the lookout for the very best rugged and purposeful clothes for winter or summer time. It is all the time arduous to search out anything near what I want. It usually goes for sneakers and slippers and different footwear too. I usually need to take whatever comes closest and that's usually within the men’s section. There are designs which I will go to my grave scratching my head over relating to why they have been made the way in which they have been.. I as soon as discovered some comfortable slip-ons made by Teva. But the absurd factor was that the soles had been designed with fairly-deep grooves that have been very carefully spaced they usually had been throughout the only real . Just why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They're the primary piece of clothes that will likely be touching the ground and going via all sorts of disgusting stuff. I've had a fantasy of designing footwear which are meant to be cleaned and are straightforward to wash. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To allow climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it doesn't work on any kind of foot put on like it really works on a Jeep’s tires. I know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothes manufacturer noticed this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and so on) get stuck in the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the fixed and intense rolling of the tires signifies that a lot of the debris will probably be hurled off. No human can create that kind of bodily force to repeatedly force the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The way in which that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles onerous to scrub. It means that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots can be filled up with debris and would not assist much in serving to the wearer to successfully climb; that is that if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are literally meant to allow the wearer to climb. It appears to me that if the soles are product of rubber there isn’t a necessity for such elaborately designed grooves that solely gather dirt. I wonder why there aren’t chemists and clothing technicians engaged on a better kind of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips better on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking sneakers are used, and it might make it unnecessary to make grooves on the soles of shoes. I have seen some unusual designs that don't contribute to operate. It appears to me that grooves are just put on the soles of shoes for vogue functions. This goes for sneakers too. A whole lot of sneakers which would be good in design in different methods, have very impractically designed soles. So far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and different such sorts of pants, there are those which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are those with drawstrings. Of course I am not an skilled in making footwear or shoe-soles and i could be incorrect , however I am enough of an professional in carrying footwear meant for lively lifestyles and I believe that a lot of shoe manufacturers are specializing in the incorrect thing. I wonder why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made so that the drawstring is stitched into the again of the pants waist area. I hate something with a drawstring waist. I think it makes the drawstring much less efficient and it defeats the purpose of the drawstring. Underwear: I've been in stores equivalent to Ok-Mart and Target where there are a big variety of women’s underwear. It is difficult to seek out the form of briefs that the majority of our grandmothers used to wear, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my view. I want comfort, durability and straightforward-care. All that does not speak for me. Something that will get stuck you-know-where is unacceptable. I have been in the underwear section of malls and different shops (I need to admit I never looked in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t anticipate to seek out anything sensible there), and I have seen older ladies looking for one thing that is age-applicable and dignified and , again, practical. There may be little apart from these hi-cuts. See one of the hyperlinks under for an article concerning the historical past of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” will not be modest enough. It seems it has all the time been about physically limiting women. That’s the way in which I take a look at it. Additionally one of the links under result in an article about how there can be a women’s like of clothes which will be impressed by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It implies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I have found to what I want is a certain Jockey brand brief “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the better type of design to get. Elastic that's merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be much less rugged and the stitching can come undone extra simply . I have to order a dimension larger than I normally would in order that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One main flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t understand the real goal of “athletic bras” the way in which they're designed. I positive don’t care about “standing out.” ( I really don’t in any case, and that i don’t care). Bras meant for active lifestyles ought to hold them in, nothing more. I've heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I have seen some feminine runners who seem like high heavy and still they're very quick however I wonder if they are going to develop back issues later in life. I know that I may not be addressing the wants of women born with sure sizes, or who have particular wants comparable to after surgery, but sport bras must be made to have sufficient comfortable tension to prevent bouncing. There may be a necessity for bras that do what some jock straps are imagined to do. I wish to design shirts and vests with tension constructed into the correct area that might make bras pointless. It would be wonderful for warmer weather and for simplicity, so you don’t need to trouble with attaching a bra after which a shirt. Simply keep “them” from transferring. Just slip into your shirt (and different clothes ) and you may exit to stroll , jog or whatever. Why isn’t there such a factor? I think I discussed in one among my earlier posts that Coolibar had a fairly good pant for girls known as Sun Pant. I am sure a number of ladies would need such forms of clothing. I then installed an elastic band to offer extra tension for the reason that waist band could be a bit too giant otherwise, and the pant is virtually a dream. I did have to change the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which concerned reducing into the back of the waistband space because the drawstring was sewn into that space. It is rather practical for a whole lot of actions. It isn't so lengthy that the hem drags on the flooring. It's not for very very popular weather however that can rely by yourself skill to tolerate scorching weather. It's of a material mix that is not like cotton. All pants ought to have pockets, but typically the way in which the pockets are designed make them useless anyway. I find it is a really individual thing. That is how most hiking pants should be designed. It is a teensy bit too dense for highly regarded weather very very similar to the unique Coolibar Solar Pant. It is meant for use with a belt however I find that I don’t want one to put on this pant. I found a pant on Cabela’s that is for men, but which fits nicely and it's named “The utility Pant” (see one of many last two hyperlinks beneath). It stretches a bit so it doesn't get tight once you bend or transfer. After all not everyone has the identical determine as I achieve this others might have a special opinion. But on the whole this is a good type of pant . If you do like it you must write to the company and tell them to hang on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the front pockets are designed so as the openings are slits nearly utterly parallel with the waist. I feel they're going to discontinue it so that you might want to offer it a try. The material stretches so it is not as dangerous as if it have been with denims with these kinds of pockets. It is an impractical design and i don’t know why clothing designers make pant pockets like this. With these kinds of pockets you have to maneuver your hands in a more unnatural method and even lift the hem of your shirt to place your hands in your front pants pockets. It has to be for style, nothing else. Pockets should be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is nice too. It's a good suggestion to have zippered pockets. Anyone who has ever gotten his/her open pocket stuck on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too shut will know what I imply. But generally zippers could cause scrapes to the again of the hand when you put your arms in. There's a need to design zippers of non-scraping materials for this function. There can be another men’s pant from Columbia. I believe I mentioned them before (see one of the 2 hyperlinks beneath). Why aren’t any clothes designers working on this? They're of an excellent materials for hot days, but for me, I discovered myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band within the back of the waistband area so as to make the belt unnecessary. I journey a bike. I rarely use shorts even after i jog. But once more, I have to settle for no matter comes close to what I need. I got here throughout a operating quick referred to as Brooks Sherpa IV. I tend to only go to clothes stores to have a look at designs and supplies . What I did like about it was the lightweight material. I simply puzzled why common lengthy pants are usually not made of such a cloth. It could be glorious for a hiking pant meant for very hot weather. The fabric was very very like a very very lightweight softshell. There's one from the North Face referred to as The Prolix jacket. I really like softshell clothes. It is extremely lightweight, not superb for chilly weather by itself however you'll be able to put layering below it. It is versatile and fits excellently and permits freedom of movement. However softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer season. Also , why aren’t there any really actually practically-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make a great summertime softshell. There must be a vest for touring. I discover myself wishing for such a factor. It does not exist. Why not make certainly one of lightweight and stretchy material? I know that I've mentioned to a lot on this put up. I'll stop for now. I hope I didn't bore anybody. I have plenty of ideas for the higher design of clothes and I will most likely put up once more with my ideas until I am told not to. I
